Category Best practice   Show all

  • Fighting climate change through online community engagement

    Share Fighting climate change through online community engagement on Facebook Share Fighting climate change through online community engagement on Twitter Share Fighting climate change through online community engagement on Linkedin Email Fighting climate change through online community engagement link

    If ever a case could be made to “think globally and act locally”, it would be for climate change. The topic and associated actions and solutions are mind-numbingly vast and daunting, leaving the average resident wondering what they themselves can do to make a difference.

    A study by Pew Research Center in October 2019 found that 62% of US adults say climate change is having at least ‘some’ effect on their community, and 22% say it’s having a ‘great deal’ of effect.

    People want to be a part of the solution. They have ideas and opinions about those solutions. It’s up to local government leaders to not only take climate change seriously based on the very real risks that face every local community but also to provide a platform for the collective stakeholder voice.

    Bringing a varied audience together for meaningful conversation

    Climate change causes visceral, and varied, reactions in many. It brings up anger and sorrow; yet inspires passion and hope. Local government agencies who are embarking upon climate change-related projects in their community should aim to hear all of the perspectives of their citizens because more people working together results in potentially viable solutions.

    Many agencies are engaging their residents in climate and sustainability action plans on their digital engagement sites and reaping the benefit of effective and efficient public involvement. Find out how you can do the same with your key projects.

    Tips for tackling local climate change projects through digital engagement

    It’s estimated that around 75% of people don’t like speaking in public meetings. Digital engagement creates inclusion that you wouldn’t otherwise get.

    The following are tips and EngagementHQ tools that will aid your agency in building your climate-related local projects into your engagement platform.

    1. Allow space for members to socialise. The social side enhances the experience for the participants and can also improve deliberation and engagement.
    2. Share an opening statement on your platform that states what the space is for, the rules of engagement, and the call-to-action for participants. Set the tone with a positive and encouraging message about what can be accomplished there.
    3. Use open dialogue wording such as “let’s have a conversation”.
    4. Offer different methods of participation through tools that allow people to share stories, post their ideas like a sticky note, take a poll, submit a question, or drop a pin on an interactive map.
    5. Include a list of organisations in your community that are taking action against climate change.
    6. Share tips on how residents can save energy, money, and reduce carbon.
    7. Use the EngagementHQ Places interactive mapping tool for climate-related projects, for example, participants could drop pins to indicate where they would like trees planted.

    Examples of Online Engagement Around Climate Issues

    Below we’ll dive into real-life examples of how communities like yours are using EngagementHQ to activate key conversations around climate in their cities.

    Residents choose level of involvement

    The City of Boulder, CO uses their site, Be Heard Boulder, to discuss their Climate Mobilisation Action Plan with residents. Online engagement is about bringing many people to the table and giving them a variety of ways to engage.

    Following this concept, the City offers a call-to-action that states: “Tell us how you would like to participate in the Climate Mobilisation Action Plan process”, and links to a form with multiple topic categories. For example, one of the categories is ‘Ecosystems’ and the multiple-choice options are for the resident to have ‘no engagement’, or to ‘be informed’, ‘be consulted’, or ‘be involved’. The level of engagement for each choice ranges from simple email updates to participating in pop-up education efforts. This gives the participant full control over how they engage with the topics that they care about most.

    Clear timeline provides understanding of process

    For their Climate Action Plan, the City of Burlington, Ontario, Canada, created a page on their EngagementHQ site, Get Involved Burlington, dedicated to involving the community in the Plan. They provide a timeline that is always visible on the page outlining the process, what stage they are currently in, key dates, as well as links to relevant reports and documents that have been finalised and released. It provides residents with an easy way to see the progress of the Plan.

    Q&A for all

    The City of Cupertino, CA uses their digital engagement platform called Engage Cupertino! to communicate about their Climate Action Plan Update. They encourage citizens to ask questions, and the answers from City staff are visible to everyone on the platform. Some of the topics that participants have asked questions about include the City’s plan to reduce plastic usage, the creation/expansion of their carbon sinks, and the City’s carbon neutrality goal.

    Going beyond the traditional survey

    The City of Chicago started a three-year planning initiative and launched an engagement site, We Will Chicago, to host the conversations in one place. The Environment, Climate, and Energy portion of the site encourages participants to take a survey about shaping future design policies.

    The questions dig much deeper than is typical of traditional surveys. Each question allows for long, written responses as opposed to surface-level multiple-choice options. One question asks: “How do we incorporate environmental justice principles and resource distribution to reverse historic disinvestment and environmental degradation in underserved communities?” By giving residents the opportunity to share their in-depth ideas and perspectives, the City receives valuable and actionable ideas.

    Educational video content

    If content is king, then video content is queen. Many people prefer to watch videos to learn about new things. When the Town of Halton Hills in Ontario, Canada developed a low-carbon transition strategy for their area they communicated about the initiative on their site, Let’s Talk Halton Hills. On the main page, they share a video about the strategy and suggest that participants watch the video before completing the survey. Additionally, they make recordings of virtual open houses available, allowing citizens to engage with the information, when it’s convenient for them.

    Digital engagement listens to many voices

    When you engage with the support activist, the scientist, and the policymakers, these diverse opinions and perspectives help to bring about effective change for climate-related issues. The critical conversations are already happening online, however social media algorithms create micro-tribes and propaganda bubbles. Rational and productive debate is greatly affected.

    By providing an alternative for productive debate, a digital engagement platform, you create a hub for the public to come together, build consensus, bring about change, and strengthen society.

    “I appreciate the City's recognition that at this point our climate response must be more radical, and take the form of enabling residents to do radical things, as well as civic programs. We need a vision to move toward, not just an apocalypse to move away from.”

    - Resident comment from Be Heard Boulder

    Reach out to us if you want to learn more about how EngagementHQ can help fight climate change locally.

  • How has community engagement changed in the last two years?

    Share How has community engagement changed in the last two years? on Facebook Share How has community engagement changed in the last two years? on Twitter Share How has community engagement changed in the last two years? on Linkedin Email How has community engagement changed in the last two years? link

    Now that we've more than a year to examine exactly how governments are doing in a time like no other - let's take a moment to unpack our most burning question: "How has the community engagement landscape changed?" with help from Deloitte Insights and our very own data and analytics guru Nishant Seth.

    Increased investment in citizen connectivity

    The pandemic has been an inflection point in the digital maturity of governments, with many looking to adopt a cohesive approach to transforming their digital capability. To do this, they’ve needed to embrace operational change, invest in flexible and scalable infrastructure (like EngagementHQ), and create intelligent workflows to get them from point A to point B.

    • Committing to fully digital services: With Governments taking up EngagementHQ at double the rate of pre-pandemic.
    • Designing proactive and seamless services: With more than 130 early adopters using Engagement Embeds for things like customer satisfaction (CSAT) survey at the end of new bin requests.

    More employees empowered and engaged in decision making because of the distributed and virtualised work model

    Many government leaders have adopted new strategies to stay connected with employees and make sure team members have the necessary tools wherever they are. Instead of managing projects, they now need to manage project teams and cost savings from real estate can be redeployed toward infrastructure, training, education, and flexible arrangements.

    Heightened drive to institutionalise design thinking for better inclusion, equity, and diversity

    While the concept of inclusive design is not new, expanding this concept beyond physical infrastructure and accessibility needs is. Governments seek to make their services accessible to every community member; they’re rethinking program structures, communication platforms, and digital capabilities. In addition, they are looking to accommodate those with physical limitations, learning and language differences, and mental health disorders.

    • Governments have been diversifying their use of community engagement tools, increasing the use of Questions and Ideas by 1.7x.
    • Many governments have used an equity lens in their COVID-19 responses leveraging tools like EngagementHQs Sentiment Analysis to detect, anticipate and address misinformation in more than 3,000 projects.

    And while many leading organisations have made significant headway in acting on these measures, more needs to be done to sustain forward momentum; a notion Mel Hagedorn, Head of Client Success ANZ, spoke to at this years IAP2 conference:

    "Lead with empathy; if you're feeling burnt out with information overload at the end of a day and can't imagine taking in another piece of 'data', assume that is how your community feels and do everything within your power to meet them where they are."

    Across industries, companies are betting big on customer experience. It’s time for governments to do the same.

    Reach out to learn more.

  • Is it really a hostile community or is it a community reacting with hostility?

    Share Is it really a hostile community or is it a community reacting with hostility? on Facebook Share Is it really a hostile community or is it a community reacting with hostility? on Twitter Share Is it really a hostile community or is it a community reacting with hostility? on Linkedin Email Is it really a hostile community or is it a community reacting with hostility? link

    In the context of community engagement, we’re sometimes asked how to deal with hostile communities. As with so many things, prevention is better than cure: it’s unlikely that the community was hostile before the issue was imposed on them. Rather, the community – or at least some members of it – are reacting with hostility.

    So what do we mean by hostility, and are communities becoming more likely to react hostility?

    The most common components of hostility are cynicism and mistrust. Reciprocity is also a feature of hostility, which can result in escalating conflict, both in how people communicate and how we behave. Hostility is cognitive; that is, it’s about what we think rather than what we feel (angry) or how we behave (negatively). Of course, it’s behaviour that is most visible and has the most impact on other people. Hostility can be contagious across a community when people share information infused with cynicism and mistrust, resulting in escalating anger and negative behaviours.

    Even before the pandemic, a Gallup poll found that people in the US were experiencing increasing levels of stress, worry and anger. Anger can also be contagious, in what psychotherapist Aaron Balick calls ‘an anger-bandwagon effect: someone expresses it and this drives someone else to express it as well.’

    We can’t leave social media out of this discussion as it is such an easy and instantaneous way to share both information and anger. Anger is a stimulant, and like any stimulant can be addictive so people look for reasons to be angry. We go online and down rabbit holes, getting angry about things happening in places we’ve never heard of, to people we’ve never met.

    As community engagement professionals with the analytical tools, we have access to, we can see that the reach of project information often goes far beyond our target audience. I once worked on a project in Australia where we received formal submissions from as far afield as Canada. This wasn’t because people in Canada were impacted, but because local residents shared the project through social networks along with a call to action, to object.

    So how do we handle anger and hostility? At best, we can apologise and start again, attempting to rebuild trust and reach the planned outcomes of our project. At worst, the community becomes divided, hostility overcoming basic neighbourhood decency and destroying relationships within the community as well as with us.

    Let’s look at prevention first and then response.

    Components of Outrage

    You’ll be familiar with the importance of thorough stakeholder analysis and may already undertake risk and opportunity assessments as part of your engagement planning. Typically, a community engagement risk assessment should follow the organisation's overarching approach to risk assessment. This is likely to include elements such as danger to people and property, financial and reputational risks, and traditional time and budget project delivery risks. There is also the option of taking a positive slant looking not just at risks but also identifying opportunities for the project and engagement. You can then develop strategies to leverage those opportunities to maximise positive outcomes of the project while simultaneously mitigating risk.

    There are two further steps you could take to bolster traditional engagement planning to reduce the risk of a hostile reception: social impact analysis (SIA) and outrage assessment.

    Using a participatory social research approach often employed in development contexts, SIA can identify deeper, richer information about the community than a traditional stakeholder analysis. SIA includes the understanding that ‘social, economic and biophysical impacts are inherently and inextricably interconnected’. This lens helps us to view the community multi-dimensionally and to consider impacts that are:

    • intended and unintended
    • positive and negative
    • short term and residual.

    Extending from and dovetailing with thorough stakeholder and risk analysis, a rigorous SIA will open up more, and more meaningful, opportunities to mitigate potential negative impacts and leverage potential positive impacts.

    Undertaking an outrage assessment will inform each of the above elements of strategic engagement planning. Peter Sandman is best known in community engagement circles for his expertise in responding to outrage (more on that later) but his 12 components of outrage are also an excellent tool for assessing the potential for outrage. Where that potential is found to be high, invest more in engaging early and sensitively.

    Those components of outrage (you could assess them on a sliding scale between each of these absolutes) are:

    • voluntary / coerced
    • natural/industrial
    • familiar / exotic
    • memorable / not memorable
    • not dreaded/dreaded
    • chronic (ie slow-moving) / catastrophic (ie sudden)
    • knowable / not knowable
    • controlled by self / controlled by others
    • fair/unfair
    • morally irrelevant / morally relevant
    • coming from a trustworthy source or proponent / untrustworthy source or proponent
    • responsive process / unresponsive process.

    Community outrage assessment

    Can you remember the first time you used the term ‘outrage’ with a project manager or other non-engagement professional? Did they think you were kidding? I clearly remember sitting down to discuss potential engagement strategies around changing the source of a community’s drinking water. The project manager laughed when I suggested we do an outrage assessment, he thought I was exaggerating. We were talking about the water coming from a different catchment – it would taste and smell different.

    As we went through Sandman’s components of outrage in the context of a parent running a bath for a baby, or an elderly person filling the jug for a cuppa, my colleague stopped laughing and agreed to invest some time and effort into an upfront engagement. This investment would easily offset costs to the customer service and media teams in dealing with the fallout if people had been left to notice the difference for themselves.

    In spite of our best laid plans, we can still find ourselves engaging with a hostile community. Or possibly because of poorly made or executed plans were asked to enter a project when a community is already hostile.

    The outrage may look like:

    • the phones are ringing hot with complaints – they are also coming in by letter, email and at the front door; there’s a protest picketing outside the building or a sit-in starting inside the building
    • the media is calling for resignations
    • your online engagement platform is being swamped with what appear to be automated submissions
    • your scientific report is being held up next to photographs of something you’ve said isn’t happening
    • community members have started their own website, taking petitions door to door, leafleting the neighbourhood and holding meetings in the park
    • another set of community members have done the same things but they are seeking the complete opposite outcome.

    I could go on, but I expect most engagement professionals are already adding to the list and perhaps feeling triggered!

    Empathy and minimising hostility

    It’s time to talk about response.

    First, opt for maximum empathy. Chances are that if a project has resulted in outrage it’s because decision-makers at some level have forgotten that the community is made up of human beings. It’s essential to remember and acknowledge this, both to ourselves and to our community. This should come from leaders in the organisation as well as officers; it should come directly and personally, as well as through official statements.

    Empathy is ‘implicated in many aspects of social cognition, notably prosocial behavior, morality, and the regulation of aggression. In other words, it’s an almost direct antidote to the cognitive trait of hostility and associated feelings of anger and antisocial behaviours.

    Empathy isn’t just a useful response, it’s an appropriate one. The community really is human and there is no point undertaking whatever the project is if it does not ultimately serve humanity (including benefits to the environment as it is critical to the survival of humanity).

    It’s now generally accepted that community outrage arising from organisational failures should be met with public acknowledgement of and apology for mistakes. This can be difficult to implement, however, where political careers are at stake or there is a perception that an apology equates to legal liability for all associated impacts. If this is an issue for you, go back to Sandman for further advice, including the observation that pretending something hasn’t happened isn’t a great defence.

    On a simply practical level, consider the following actions:

    • Set up an internal working group; include representatives from, for example, the project team, your customer service people, and the media team. Share any new information with the group, problem-solve with them and run planned actions past them before implementing.
    • Seek delegation of authority for decision-making to one executive and/or one elected member or board member. This will telescope approval processes to maximise agility.
    • Have a single spokesperson who can be the face of the organisation with empathy and humility. In time, this person’s integrity and credibility will become established but empathy and humility must come first.
    • Provide daily updates to other internal stakeholders to reassure them, provide them with accurate information and leverage their knowledge of the community.
    • Have a single point of contact in your team or working group for all questions or ideas from the rest of the organisation so that they can be triaged and appropriately responded to without slowing you down.
    • Establish a ‘single point of truth’ on your engagement project page. Keep this constantly updated and point everything else towards it (ie media, social media etc).
    • Work with your engagement platform provider/website hosting service to mitigate any risk of denial-of-service attacks.
    • Invite people in (in small groups - perhaps family groups, households – I’m not suggesting a town hall). Sit down and listen to them. Let them air their grievances without interrupting or judging.
    • Don’t even judge them amongst yourselves.
    • Consider your options for discontinuing the engagement.
    • Start thinking about how you’re going to interpret and report on the feedback you’re getting from photocopied submissions to flaming Facebook posts.

    A further and ongoing element of response is the long term undertaking to repair trust and rebuild relationships, both between the proponent and the community and within the community. This will take time and can only happen in an atmosphere of demonstrated integrity – follow through, close the loop, be present. Take a community development approach to communities where neighbourly relationships have been damaged.

    Hostility is unhealthy – for individuals and for communities. Evidence links hostility and trait anger to increased risk of cardiac disease morbidity and mortality. US non-profit organisation, The Borgen Project, lists social hostility as one of the five critical global issues that are affecting the world in a catastrophic way.

    Whatever our role or sector – engagement professionals, project managers, decision makers – we have a responsibility to minimise our impact and our potential to cause hostility. Let’s aim for prevention instead of response.

  • Top 6 agenda items for changemakers in 2022

    Share Top 6 agenda items for changemakers in 2022 on Facebook Share Top 6 agenda items for changemakers in 2022 on Twitter Share Top 6 agenda items for changemakers in 2022 on Linkedin Email Top 6 agenda items for changemakers in 2022 link

    Being an agent of change isn't easy at the best of times. Add a backlog of policy decisions, lost institutional knowledge and a climate emergency into the mix, and it's easy to feel burnt out before the new year begins. So here are the top 6 agenda items to help you focus time and energy on what matters in 2022.

    1. Consult early on policy decisions

    In the last few years, there's been an understandable reassignment of many key communication staff to booster public health campaigns, with few able to prioritise the essential task of updating (now painfully old) policy. But, whether it's supply-chain issues, energy policies or changes in transportation, many are scrambling to recover lost time on overdue consultations. Our tip: engage early to foster co-creation and trust with a public now acutely aware of their right to have their say.

    2. Run a community advocacy program

    For those of you preparing for local elections, now is the time to kick off your community advocacy program to ensure you access the necessary funds and meet the growing needs of your community.

    3. Deliver on 'climate emergency' rhetoric

    Local authorities, especially those who have proclaimed a 'climate emergency', are now under pressure to deliver radical solutions to a public that is far better informed and alarmed about the dangers of doing nothing. Maybe it's kicking off local traffic schemes that promote walking/cycling and reduce car dependency, an energy efficiency scheme, or a waste management initiative, but now is the time to 'make good'.

    4. Take a chance to innovate

    Traditionally, the people working to strengthen democracy have been caught flat-footed by the pace of new trends and innovations thanks to internal bureaucracy. One massive benefit of large scale operational and institutional change is the chance to innovate. Now is the time to advocate for the change you want to see. Maybe it's increased feedback points throughout the constitute journey, benchmarking community satisfaction or experimenting with your engagement toolkit. More on the trends changing community engagement here.

    5. Make use of available funding

    Whether it's technology adoption, community connectivity or innovation, funds are being made available globally to develop technological capability and systems of government. The PropTech Engagement Fund launched to support the widespread adoption of digital citizen engagement tools and services in the UK. The USA has passed a $1.2trillion infrastructure bill to ensure every American has access to the internet, here’s looking at you ‘smart cities’.

    While in Australia, the Community Investments Stream offers $5000 to $1million grants to support new or expanded local events, strategic regional plans or leadership and capability strengthening activities that provide economic and social benefits to regional and remote areas.

    6. Account for skills & experience shortages

    We've seen a considerable shake-out among those who work in public engagement, and reliance on consultancies won't substitute in-house know-how. So if you're one of the surefooted specialists who know the difference between open, mixed and controlled engagement environments, now is the time to upskill internal teams. Document engagement strategy, create blueprints and build templates to streamline consultation processes to reap more long-term benefits like meeting or exceeding budgetary goals, reducing risk and increased trust.

    With a tough economic backdrop and the inherent destabilising effect of the pandemic, it's easy to feel hesitant about moving forward with public engagement, but if the last two years have taught us anything, it's that we can no longer take the status quo for granted, change comes quickly and it's the relationships we hold with people (both internally & externally) that endure.

    Want to discuss these trends further with fellow community engagement practitioners? Reach out to us!

  • Why “Register Here” Matters for Online Public Consultation

    Share Why “Register Here” Matters for Online Public Consultation on Facebook Share Why “Register Here” Matters for Online Public Consultation on Twitter Share Why “Register Here” Matters for Online Public Consultation on Linkedin Email Why “Register Here” Matters for Online Public Consultation link

    Unlike social media, an online consultation platform should create safe places for public participation. A place where participants can get involved and have their say on important matters without fear of being harassed or trolled. Whilst anonymous participation has some benefits, anecdotal evidence suggests when people “sign up” they make a subconscious decision to treat others with respect and deliberate issues in a productive manner.

    Making people register before they contribute to a public consultation also helps because:

    • People feel they are part of an inclusive group of individuals who are investing in a project or topic, with considered contributions, which is what community participation is all about.
    • Demographic questions help consultors to understand who has and has not taken part and therefore helps promote inclusive engagement. Managers can take action before it is too late to encourage more diverse participation.
    • Updates can be sent to participants, to encourage them to take part in more discussions within a project.
    • Project owners can close the loop and provide feedback to people about the outcome of the public consultation.
    • When people complete a registration process it helps to ensure they are authentic, real people. This can help managers to quality control their projects and reduce the potential for participants to manipulate the consultation process.
    • It allows you to build communities of place and interest. These are people you can invite to participate in consultation projects time and time again, which makes participation more continuous, representative, and cost-effective.
    • You can establish groups that can be assigned to protected and citizen panel projects where their deliberations can take part in private.

    So let’s hear it for participant registration and help to create safe*, inclusive, and meaningful online public consultation!

    *Further information about which EngagementHQ tools are NOT, SOMETIMES, and ALWAYS moderated see here.

    Want to discuss more online community engagement tips with us? Let's chat.

  • Don't consult over Christmas; It's rude.

    Share Don't consult over Christmas; It's rude. on Facebook Share Don't consult over Christmas; It's rude. on Twitter Share Don't consult over Christmas; It's rude. on Linkedin Email Don't consult over Christmas; It's rude. link

    Here's a graphic showing cumulative traffic to all of the sites we manage over the past three years.


    EngagementHQ traffic L-R 1 July until 30 June.


    The starting point on the left-hand side is July 1st, trailing up and down through to June 30th on the right-hand side.

    That canyon in the middle of the line... Christmas week.

    The community hasn't suddenly decided NOT to take a break (just like you and me) over Christmas.

    Everyone is putting their feet up. No one (well, almost no one) is checking your website daily to see if there are any new projects to talk about.

    So, please, take a break over Christmas and please, please, PLEASE let your community take a break too.

    If you are working, then take the time to plan for a golden year of community engagement ahead.

    Things will get back to normal by mid-January and you'll be able to launch all of those projects that seemed so very important the week before Christmas.

  • Is registration a barrier to participation?

    Share Is registration a barrier to participation? on Facebook Share Is registration a barrier to participation? on Twitter Share Is registration a barrier to participation? on Linkedin Email Is registration a barrier to participation? link

    One of the most common questions about participation in online engagement, is whether the signup or registration process has negative effects on participation rates.

    To answer this, we looked at our Google Analytics traffic data for all sites over 2016 and analysed user behaviour. Here's what we found;

    • 80% of people who reached the signup form page completed registration or continued browsing
    • Participants who didn't sign up straight away were likely to revisit the signup during their 2nd and 3rd interactions after visiting project pages
    • Participants who landed on sites via the login page spent 3 times longer engaging with projects and had a longer overall session duration
    • A sites homepage was the greatest factor influencing participation. i.e. bounce or through traffic.
    • Returning users spent longer on average engaging with client sites

    This analysis shows that a registration processes in isolation isn't a massive barrier to participation. It does however, tell us that home pages are far more important to participant engagement than almost any other factor.

    This reinforces what we have always known about human behaviour and engagement - that a decision to take part in any engagement it is far more influenced by desire to engage and relationship to the project than anything else.

    In essence, capturing attention, communicating clearly, having a range of projects available and creating a value proposition for your community is more likely to have a greater impact on participation than a registration process.

    We highly recommend you use Google Analytics tracking on your own site to monitor your community behaviour and do further analysis on your projects and user journeys.

    It's worth noting these insights are taken as a collective of user behaviour across all sectors and projects and they will vary project to project.

    To enable traffic tracking with Google Analytics simply paste your tracking code on the advanced tab under general settings.

    You should also ensure that you are aware of our custom built Traffic Tracking tool for reporting on your consultations. This will show you referral data to your sites.


    Upload your Google Analytics code in the Site Settings section of EHQUpload your Google Analytics code in the Site Settings section of EHQ



    How registration helps you utilise EHQ

    Central to EngagementHQ is our Participant Relationship Management tool, which allows you to capture information about your community.

    This database is used to assist you in effectively managing many aspects of online engagement with EHQ.

    Without investing in a registration process and building your community database you will limit your ability to do the following;

    Understand your community participation profile across projects

    By accessing EHQ demographics report you can filter and generate graphs to reveal the profile of your engaged community. This profile helps you identify whom you have talked to and where the gaps are in the reach of your activities.

    You can also use this report to filter via your sign-up form questions, aware informed and engaged metrics and also by first and last seen date. This means you can create a list of your most engaged community members, identify your least engaged and target people who haven't been seen since a certain date. All of these types of metrics are essential for, annual reporting and evaluation as well as ongoing promotion of your projects and without registration this data will be incomplete.

    To download a demographics report to uncover your community database go to Analytics>Reports.To download a demographics report to uncover your community database go to Analytics>Reports.


    Creating protected project pages and community panels

    Your online community database also allows you to establish groups which can be assigned to protected and community panel consultations. For example, you might want to assign a special discussion space to a key stakeholder group made up of farmers from a certain town. Without participant information in your database to help you create this group you will not be able to assign people to the farmers to this protected discussion space.

    Creating protected groups and community panels are great online engagement tools, which can expand your methodology by securing projects for discussion, deliberation and transparent community panels. The creation of these groups requires that you have registered participants in your portal and again, your signup process is needed to support this.

    To utilise project visibility you need to create groups based on your community database. This requires registration.To utilise project visibility you need to create groups based on your community database. This requires registration.


    Sending newsletters and communicating with segments

    Communicating directly with your community utilising EngagementHQ Newsletters also requires you to have well managed and maintained community database. This again, can only be captured via registration or signup with your site.

    By having a carefully crafted signup process, you can better utilise this feature to promote your consultations. As the following section demonstrates, asking key segmenting questions on your registration form will also allow better targeting at different groups via EHQ Newsletters. Find our more about using groups to send newsletters here.

    Securing and verifying your community feedback

    For consultations that require rigorous decision making and reporting processes having each piece of feedback attributable to an authenticated person will be crucial. Moreover, for most formal submission processes you will be required to collect a full name, address, email and contact number anyway, so why not get your participants to register so you don't need to collect it every time they want to engage.

    This means you can report with confidence that your responses have been received from real people and reduce potential for participants to game your consultation process. This authentication can only be done via registration. In our opinion this is one of the most important reasons you would invest time creating and promoting a good registration process for your site.

    In summary, the whole purpose of engagement is to collect useful feedback data from real people and being able to back it up with confidence.

    Using a registration process instead of anonymous participation can also prevent participants hijacking discussion forums, and stacking results in surveys.

    With surveys in particular, many practitioners are inclined to have anonymous surveys, and simply capture demographic information about the participants as part of the survey. While this works to the same ends as verifying user data, we feel it becomes a burdensome task for participants over time to repeatedly have to provide their personal information when they could do it just once via registration.

    What does a good signup form include?

    Creating a signup form which is suitable for your organisation will be dependant on how you want to segment your community database and use personal information for decision making.

    While each organisation will be different, there are some common questions which make up a good registration form that strikes a balance between capturing data and not deterring your participants. Generally speaking these include key demographics like age, sex and location as well as relationship questions to help with segmenting.

    Beyond these, we recommend thinking about some non-compulsory questions which can assist you in decisions making.

    You can reduce the pressure on your participants by asking them to volunteer their information instead of demanding it.

    Using short descriptions and conditional questions are a great way to help explain to your participants why you want the data, how privacy will be protected and how it will benefit the consultations process.

    Below is an example of a well designed registration form. We feel this strikes a good balance between compulsory questions and voluntary questions.

    Good example of reassuring community about their privacy during signup.Good example of reassuring community about their privacy during signup.


    The next image shows a good way to ask conditional non-compulsory questions as part of a registration process.

    Example of using supplementary questions on a signup form.


    So as you can see from our traffic flow data, most people aren't deterred by the signup process on its own, instead a bigger influence on their participation is whether or not they have a desire to take part because the issue directly affects them. Once we realise this it's easy to see the benefits of utilising a good registration process to attribute and authenticate feedback data, segment and understand our community profile and better target segments through newsletter campaigns. If you're still in doubt, we highly recommend you conduct your own analysis on user behaviour to your site and we'd be happy to compare notes.

  • Engaging with Children, Youth and Young Adults

    Share Engaging with Children, Youth and Young Adults on Facebook Share Engaging with Children, Youth and Young Adults on Twitter Share Engaging with Children, Youth and Young Adults on Linkedin Email Engaging with Children, Youth and Young Adults link
    Children, youth and young adults are directly impacted by the decisions we make now and should be considered in all forms of community engagement.


    Logan City Council, in partnership with Logan Together and The Salvation Army Communities for Children Facilitating Partner, developed Listen 2 Connect, a guideline to enable meaningful engagement with children, youth and young adults (birth to 25 years) in the City of Logan. This guideline aims to provide project officers and decision-makers with the tools and knowledge necessary for meaningful community engagement with children, youth and young adults in the City of Logan.

    Hear from Erin Searle, Senior Community and Stakeholder Engagement Advisor at Logan City Council, on how Logan City Council approached the development of Listen 2 Connect and its use within Council and community.

    Highly recommended for community engagement and communications officers to hear about how to ensure views and experiences of children, youth and young adults are considered in decision-making processes.

    What you’ll learn:

    • Importance of engaging with children, youth and young adults

    • How Logan is using technology to engage with young people

    • How to get the organisation and partners on board to increase the profile of engaging with young people

    • How to empower staff and build their capacity to better engage with young people

    • Key areas to consider when developing engagement plans on how, where and when to engage

    • Tips on how you can promote and deliver best practice youth engagement for your projects


    Duration: 81 mins

    Engaging with Children, Youth and Young Adults